<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Trinity Sunday Sermon, 2009</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.leanderharding.com/blog/2009/07/19/trinity-sunday-sermon-2009/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.leanderharding.com/blog/2009/07/19/trinity-sunday-sermon-2009/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 12:04:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brent Gentsch</title>
		<link>http://www.leanderharding.com/blog/2009/07/19/trinity-sunday-sermon-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-21820</link>
		<dc:creator>Brent Gentsch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 23:50:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leanderharding.com/blog/2009/07/19/trinity-sunday-sermon-2009/#comment-21820</guid>
		<description>Dr. Harding, this is excellent.  I appreciate the discussion.  Best and blessings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dr. Harding, this is excellent.  I appreciate the discussion.  Best and blessings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl J. Fielstra</title>
		<link>http://www.leanderharding.com/blog/2009/07/19/trinity-sunday-sermon-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-14955</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl J. Fielstra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 05:14:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leanderharding.com/blog/2009/07/19/trinity-sunday-sermon-2009/#comment-14955</guid>
		<description>I enjoyed reading the message regarding the Trinity. 

Though there have been many attempts to explain this humanly incomprehensible doctrine, I find it helpful to use the analogy of a person who, though a single being, may be a son/daughter, spouse, and parent.  He/she is all three within a single being.  The analogy falls short, however, since he/she relates within his/her family system in singular roles, whereas outside of the family system he/she may simultaneously be all three.

What I cannot fully comprehend I accept by faith.  If full comprehension is important, it will be accomplished when I am with God, Son, and Holy Spirit in glory.

Until then, I have the incredible privilege of knowing all three in my various experiences with God as I walk, work, study, and minister.

Blessings,

Carl J. Fielstra</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I enjoyed reading the message regarding the Trinity. </p>
<p>Though there have been many attempts to explain this humanly incomprehensible doctrine, I find it helpful to use the analogy of a person who, though a single being, may be a son/daughter, spouse, and parent.  He/she is all three within a single being.  The analogy falls short, however, since he/she relates within his/her family system in singular roles, whereas outside of the family system he/she may simultaneously be all three.</p>
<p>What I cannot fully comprehend I accept by faith.  If full comprehension is important, it will be accomplished when I am with God, Son, and Holy Spirit in glory.</p>
<p>Until then, I have the incredible privilege of knowing all three in my various experiences with God as I walk, work, study, and minister.</p>
<p>Blessings,</p>
<p>Carl J. Fielstra</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

