<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Christianity and Postmodernism: Richard Rorty and John Paul II’s Fides et Ratio</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.leanderharding.com/blog/2008/01/03/christianity-and-postmodernism-by-dr-david-scott/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.leanderharding.com/blog/2008/01/03/christianity-and-postmodernism-by-dr-david-scott/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 17:28:49 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: phil swain</title>
		<link>http://www.leanderharding.com/blog/2008/01/03/christianity-and-postmodernism-by-dr-david-scott/#comment-611</link>
		<dc:creator>phil swain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 19:29:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leanderharding.com/blog/2008/01/03/christianity-and-postmodernism-by-dr-david-scott/#comment-611</guid>
		<description>Dr. Scott says that what is at stake is God's absolute freedom.  This statement is pertinent because Pope  Benedict has recently addressed this issue in his Regensberg speech.  If I understand Pope Benedict correctly he's saying that God's freedom is grounded  in truth which is another way of saying that it's rational.  What Benedict was criticizing was a notion of the will of God being untethered from  reason.  Absolute freedom strikes me as a terrifying notion. 

I seriously doubt that Protestants will want to embrace Rorty's post-modernism as the cost of doing business without a Magisterium.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dr. Scott says that what is at stake is God&#8217;s absolute freedom.  This statement is pertinent because Pope  Benedict has recently addressed this issue in his Regensberg speech.  If I understand Pope Benedict correctly he&#8217;s saying that God&#8217;s freedom is grounded  in truth which is another way of saying that it&#8217;s rational.  What Benedict was criticizing was a notion of the will of God being untethered from  reason.  Absolute freedom strikes me as a terrifying notion. </p>
<p>I seriously doubt that Protestants will want to embrace Rorty&#8217;s post-modernism as the cost of doing business without a Magisterium.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
